As has been documented before, there’s not good evidence that Trump is generally a bigot. He doesn’t appear to hold overtly racist views, though he certainly seems to have an incorrect perspective on what life is like for most black folks. He doesn’t seem to really care about gay marriage on way or the other, and he isn’t afraid to be seen holding up a giant rainbow flag from his LGBT supporters.
He’s not, as far as I can tell, running scared of transgender folks because they might be using the same bathroom as cisgender folks. His misogyny, on the other hand, is well-documented and flagrant. So why are progressives asserting, in many cases, that he’s a serious problem for transgender, gay, or black folks? That his personal racism is obvious?
Well, that has to do with how progressives generally define racism and how they see racism, sexism, transphobia, homophobia, and even capitalism as parts of a whole set of systems of oppression. For most progressives who are basing their understanding on contemporary academic theories (largely influenced by the meta-philosophical framework of Critical Theory), these issues are inherently connected.
In their heads, sexism, heterosexism, racism, transphobia, and capitalism are all of a piece; they are all cogs in the machinery of oppression, if you will. In the heads of other people, those issues are sometimes quite separate. Compartmentalized, even. There are people who want gay folks to be able to get married who also shudder at the idea of sharing a bathroom with a transgender person.
There are people who care about and vote for policies that will address racial injustice who don’t think that two men having consensual sex is the correct moral decision. There are flagrant sexists who think it’s perfectly fine if a man wants to become a woman because that’s what he’s always wanted. People are complicated, and they can separate these issues out.
Either they can do this because they’re not concerned about being intellectually coherent (and most people aren’t) or because they have an alternative intellectually coherent framework for understanding these issues. In Trump’s case, it appears to be due to his lack of concern for being intellectually coherent.
He’s not an ideologue worried about the right answer, but rather a 70 year-old rich man who’s fairly clueless about recent trends in academic thought and trying to drum up support from anyone and everyone he can get it from. He’s careless and reckless in his statements, and that’s a serious problem, but it isn’t good evidence of his generally being intolerant or hateful or indifferent to the concerns of the marginalized.
We’ll find out more as time goes on, but I suspect based on his behavior that Trump is generally not principled enough to be a white supremacist, or anything else ideological.