The War on Words: Tolerance and Bigotry

This is the fifth post in a series of however many I feel like blog posts on the misuse and abuse of language with regard to controversial topics.  For some context, it might be helpful to read the posts in order starting with the first one.  The second one, third one, and fourth one may also be of interest.  Maybe I’ll even manage a sixth entry in the series.  It’s not as if there’s a lack of material in our wild public discourse.

The War on Words can get very petty when the war is conducted on the home front where personal attacks are common and passions are high.  Accusations as to the abominable nature of an opponent’s character rain upon the field of battle where we wrestle with issues of our own social status and personal pursuit of happiness.  It’s not unlike the old childhood games of deciding who gets to play with the cool kids and the new toys and who does not get to do that.  The main difference is that as adults, we have less excuse for that sort of nonsense.  I dislike tolerating childish nonsense from adults, and yet I often have to.

Tolerance is a much-coveted virtue these days, although I probably wouldn’t include it in a list of virtues if asked.  We have all sorts of folks calling us to tolerance, but what does tolerance mean?  Well, the word has multiple meanings.  One of those meanings suggests that being tolerant is to put up with something burdensome or reprehensible.  Another suggests that tolerance lies in those who have developed a resistance to the ill effects of a mild neurotoxin.  When used in that sense, which it often is when referring to those we find repugnant, tolerance is not a virtue at all.  It’s a pragmatic attempt to prevent destructive behavior.  Which is fine, but hardly exemplary or impressive.  I’ll not be giving out any cookies for that.

The other understanding of tolerance is the expression of a fair-minded and permissive attitude, an attitude that fosters the absence of bigotry.  This is perhaps closer to a virtue, though I am reluctant to include permissiveness in the definition of a virtue.  It suggests that others need your permission, which is often simply not the case and should not be the case in a free society where we act like adults.  The thing that amuses me so much about the movement towards tolerance is how incredibly condescending it is while making every pretense of being quite the opposite.

 Nonetheless, you must be tolerant.  After all, if you aren’t tolerant, you must be one of those evil bigots.

And speaking of bigots, who’s a bigot anyway?  Thankfully, that’s a much simpler matter.  The definition is fairly clear.  A bigot is the sort of person who is utterly intolerant of differing beliefs, the kind of person who can’t deal with people having opinions very different from their own and is easily offended by expressions of opinion that do not fit with their vision of appropriate conduct.  The great thing about bigotry is that it’s an equal opportunity phenomenon.  You find it in people of all races, creeds, and hairstyles.  It’s one of the things that we really share as human beings, a trait that is prevalent in all of our arbitrary groupings of people that are at best based on superficial qualities. 

And many of the people who are quite aghast at bigotry when it is directed at members of their group think it’s totally acceptable when directed at a group that don’t like.  White supremacists who think that attacking a white kid is atrocious, but the thousands of violent deaths of black kids each year isn’t really worth talking about.  Terrorists who think that our government’s actions are terrible, but their blowing a lot of people up is totally justified.  Socialist revolutionaries who are alarmed at how the wealthy enrich themselves at the expense of the poor, but don’t seem to mind enriching their cronies and killing folks who get in their way.  Corporate executives who think that the poor have it too easy these days right before they step on their private plane to earn hundreds of dollars per hour for talking to people in a big room.  I could go on, because almost every group has members who engage in rank hypocrisy when it comes to bigotry.

The real tragedy of bigotry is less about how often it occurs and more about how often we fail to see our own participation in it.  We so often see ourselves as the innocent victims of bigotry and never the perpetrators of it, an exercise of self-delusion that is truly impressive.

Perhaps someday we can be honest with ourselves and accepting of others, but I suspect that for now we will be stuck in the ruts of tolerance and bigotry while complaining about how someone else should be moving us forward.

This entry was posted in Poetic Prose, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to The War on Words: Tolerance and Bigotry

  1. Lol it did not surprise me when I opened that link and it came from Reddit…

  2. Nous_Apeiron says:

    @ShimmerBodyCream – Are you bigoted against Reddit, Shimmer?  Hm?  

  3. AOK4WAY says:

    Tolerance has become the battle cry of liars. In the so-called “land of the free”, why should anyone have to tolerate an intolerable person or intolerable practice? Its a giant mind you-know-what, and I’m not buying it. Where God draws the line, I draw the line, and I’ll not cross over it. Peace

  4. Bels_Kaylar says:

    you mean “we must be the change we wish to see in the world”? 😉 

  5. Nous_Apeiron says:

    @Bels_Kaylar – That’s a great phrase to sum it up with, yes.@AOK4WAY – I think they lie to themselves more than anyone else.  Peace to you as well.

  6. AOK4WAY says:

    @Nous_Apeiron – I think that’s very insightful. Thanks

  7. Aloysius_son says:

    If there is one thing I can not tollerate it is intollerance!Perhaps in the war of words if we understood that our words often mean more than we perceive, the conflict would end and cooperation would ensue. The subtle nuances of language are lost on the uneducated and weak minded individual. Even today as I attemped to share in a philosophical/theological investigation into faith, my coinvestigator, took immediatre and unjustified offense at my expression and dissertaion, claiming inacurately my implied meanings, and inacurately citing tenets of faith, merely due to his inability to process an alternate point of view to his very own.I can’t help but to wonder if anyone can open their own minds completely to the truth.

  8. Nous_Apeiron says:

    @Aloysius_son – I have wondered that myself.  It’s an interesting question.After studying human cognition and artificial intelligence, my conclusion on that question is that it is possible for a mind to be totally open to data, though that can only happen within the boundaries of its perceptual mechanisms.  Such a computer or a human mind would excel at absorbing raw data in an unprejudiced fashion.The problem is that without a structure for turning that data into useful information via organizational schema, it would be impossible for a human being or a computer to function in a practical way.  Such a computer would simply be a memory dump for whatever came its way with little practical use, and in similar fashion a human mind of that quality would just be a pool of raw data with no way to process it in such a way as to live their life and survive.  They would probably go insane and die.

  9. Bels_Kaylar says:

    @Nous_Apeiron – a. i just rec’d a post and more to the point, a xangan i thought you might like (‘Iamsurrounded’ : Logical thinking). b. everytime i read this post and/or your answers to comments, i am struck by the ‘education’ question again. it occurs to me that we should put more into the first 12 grades. combine high school and college, or introduce classes into every high school on ‘logic’, debate, questioning one’s values without fear. at the bottom of it, some of us are afraid to question God. yes? are we afraid He/She is not there and what would that mean for us? do people think without the Book, the world would go to h… in a handbasket? sorry, i come here and i start thinking!!  

  10. Nous_Apeiron says:

    @Bels_Kaylar – Found and subscribed.  Thanks for the suggestion.    I have a long list of suggestions for improving education in the U.S.  Perhaps I will do a post on it when I have a break between semesters and can really do that much writing.I’m glad you have a thinking problem when you visit.  That was my intent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.